Skip to main content
Entertainment

Why Streaming Companies Stopped Building Games and Started Buying Them

Netflix spent five years assembling game studios, then closed most of them — and is now acquiring Warner Bros. Games inside an $82.7 billion deal. Disney reached the same conclusion and bought 9% of Epic instead. What changed, and why games sit on your TV now.

10 min read
Share:
A wireless game controller glowing on a wooden table in a darkened living room, with a large flat-screen television lit blue on the wall behind it
Jakub Żerdzicki on Unsplash

In December 2025, Netflix agreed to acquire Warner Bros. in a deal with a total enterprise value of $82.7 billion. The announcements listed the obvious prizes: HBO, HBO Max, the film and television studios, Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, the DC characters.

They barely mentioned that the deal also includes Warner Bros. Games — the owner of NetherRealm Studios (Mortal Kombat), Rocksteady Studios (Batman: Arkham), TT Games (the LEGO titles) and Avalanche Software. The games division received so little attention in the official materials and SEC filings that its inclusion was confirmed to Game Developer by a Warner Bros. Discovery spokesperson.

That is a strange way to acquire some of the most valuable game studios in the industry. It is also the clearest signal yet of how streaming companies now think about games: not as something to make, but as something to own.

First, Netflix Tried Building

Netflix launched games in 2021 and pursued them seriously. It bought mobile studios. It opened its own, staffing an internal team — Team Blue — with developers recruited from Blizzard, Bungie and Sony Santa Monica, and set them to work on an original AAA title it never publicly described.

Pipeline diagram showing Netflix's three games strategies across five years. Phase one, Build, 2021 to 2023: buy and staff mobile studios, hire AAA developers from Blizzard, Bungie and Sony Santa Monica. Phase two, Retreat, 2024 to 2025: close Team Blue and abandon the in-house AAA game, shut Boss Fight, Night School and Moonloot. Phase three, Buy, 2026: cloud games on the TV plus Warner Bros. Games inside an 82.7 billion dollar studio acquisition. A band notes the strategy that survived was the one that does not require making games, and a footer explains phase one treated games as content to produce while phase three treats them as engagement to acquire
The direction reversed twice in five years. Only the surviving strategy avoids the business of actually developing games.

Then It Closed Almost All of It

The retreat was rapid and, for the people involved, expensive.

Team Blue was shut down in 2024, and with it the in-house AAA project. Boss Fight Entertainment — the studio behind Squid Game: Unleashed — was closed in October 2025, affecting around 130 jobs, including that of chief executive David Rippy. Night School Studio, the developer of Oxenfree and Netflix's first-ever studio acquisition, and Moonloot Games were also slated for closure.

Read as a set, these decisions say something specific. Netflix did not conclude that games were the wrong bet. It concluded that developing games was the wrong bet — a business with long timelines, unpredictable hit rates and cost structures that look nothing like commissioning a series.

Under games chief Alain Tascan, the remaining strategy narrowed to categories that suit a general entertainment audience: party games, narrative games, children's games and titles with mainstream hooks.

What Netflix Actually Wants Now: Your Television

The surviving strategy has almost nothing to do with studios.

Co-CEO Greg Peters has described cloud-based games on the television as a big priority for 2026, and the games division is built around a cloud-first approach: the game runs on Netflix's servers and streams to the screen, so the television becomes the console. As of April 2026, Netflix offered more than 120 mobile and cloud games to subscribers, with no advertising and no microtransactions — a deliberate contrast with the mobile games market it originally entered.

The pipeline reflects the shift toward broad, recognisable titles rather than original creative bets, including a football simulator from Delphi Interactive and a FIFA-branded game.

This is a distribution strategy wearing the clothes of a content strategy. Netflix does not need to build a studio to put a game on your television. It needs rights and bandwidth.

Disney Reached the Same Conclusion by a Different Route

Netflix is not an outlier. Disney arrived at the same judgement two years earlier and acted on it in the opposite direction.

Two-column comparison diagram. The left column, Netflix, buy the studios, own the franchises outright: the Warner Bros deal at 82.7 billion dollars enterprise value, bringing NetherRealm, Rocksteady and TT Games, and the Mortal Kombat, Batman Arkham and LEGO franchises, announced December 2025 and not yet cleared, with the verdict of total control but regulatory risk. The right column, Disney, buy into the platform, rent someone else's audience: 1.5 billion dollars for roughly 9 percent of Epic Games, characters placed inside Fortnite, first result live in November 2025, no studios to run and no staff to cut, with the verdict of fast and cheap but not yours. A band notes neither company chose to build
Two instruments, one conclusion. Disney stated plainly that it did not want to depend on its own internal game development.

In February 2024, Disney paid $1.5 billion for an equity stake of roughly 9% in Epic Games, explicitly because it did not want to rely primarily on its own internal game-development capability. Rather than build a Disney game, it bought a position in the platform where the audience already was, and began placing its characters inside Fortnite. The first visible product, Disneyland Game Rush, launched as a limited-time Fortnite island in November 2025.

The trade-off between the two approaches is clean. Netflix's route gives it outright ownership of franchises and the studios that make them, at the cost of $82.7 billion and a regulatory review. Disney's route was faster and roughly fifty times cheaper, but it does not own the platform, the players, or the relationship.

Why Streaming Companies Want Games At All

The strategic logic is about engagement, not games revenue.

A streaming subscription is cancelled when a subscriber runs out of reasons to open the app. Films and series are consumed and finished. Games are not: they are played repeatedly, often for years, and they create habit in a way a completed limited series cannot.

Netflix has been direct about this framing. Peters said of the Warner Bros. acquisition that the company expects to "attract and retain more subscribers, drive more engagement and generate incremental revenue and operating income." Retention comes first in that sentence, and it is the part games are meant to serve.

Netflix has also stated a target of $2–3 billion in annual cost savings within three years of the deal — a reminder that a transaction of this size is justified by consolidation economics, with games as an addition rather than the thesis.

Where the Deal Actually Stands

It is worth being precise about status, because the numbers have moved.

The agreement was announced on 5 December 2025 at a total enterprise value of $82.7 billion, and was later amended to an all-cash transaction at $27.75 per share, giving an equity value of roughly $72 billion. Both boards approved it unanimously, and shareholders of both companies have voted in favour.

It has not closed. Completion is expected after Warner Bros. Discovery separates its cable operations — Discovery Global — into a separate public company, planned for the third quarter of 2026, and the transaction still requires regulatory clearance. That review is not a formality: bringing Netflix and HBO Max under one owner combines two of the largest subscription streaming services in the world, which is exactly the kind of concentration antitrust regulators examine closely.

Until it clears, Warner Bros. Games remains Warner Bros. Games.

What This Means for Players

Three consequences are already visible.

Games are moving to the television. Cloud delivery removes the console from the equation, which broadens the potential audience enormously and narrows what kinds of games make sense — latency-tolerant, controller-light, easy to start.

Fewer original games from streaming platforms. The closures of Team Blue, Night School and Boss Fight removed most of the capacity that would have produced them. What replaces it is licensed and acquired material.

Big franchises may change hands. If the Warner Bros. deal completes, Mortal Kombat, Batman: Arkham and the LEGO games will be owned by a streaming company whose primary business is subscriptions — a different set of incentives from a traditional games publisher, and a genuinely open question for how those series are made and sold.

The Bottom Line

Streaming companies have not lost interest in games. They have lost interest in making them.

Netflix tested the alternative directly, spending four years building studios and then closing them, and has settled on a strategy of streaming games to televisions and acquiring franchises it did not create. Disney skipped the experiment and bought into someone else's platform. Both concluded that game development is a poor fit for a business built on commissioning content and selling subscriptions.

For readers weighing their own setup, our guides to choosing between a gaming PC and a console and building a home streaming setup cover the practical side, and how Netflix decides what you watch explains the recommendation engine that all of this engagement strategy ultimately feeds. Follow the story through our streaming hub and gaming hub.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Netflix buying Warner Bros. Games?

Yes, as part of a much larger transaction. Netflix's agreement to acquire Warner Bros., announced on 5 December 2025 at a total enterprise value of $82.7 billion, includes the Warner Bros. Games division alongside the film and television studios, HBO and HBO Max. The games unit was barely referenced in the official announcements, and its inclusion was confirmed by a Warner Bros. Discovery spokesperson.

Which game studios would Netflix own?

Warner Bros. Games includes NetherRealm Studios, the developer of Mortal Kombat; Rocksteady Studios, which created the Batman: Arkham series; TT Games, which makes the LEGO titles; and Avalanche Software. The transaction has not closed, so these studios remain under Warner Bros. ownership for now.

Has the Netflix–Warner Bros. deal been completed?

Not yet. Both boards approved it unanimously and shareholders of both companies have voted in favour, and the terms were amended to an all-cash deal at $27.75 per share. Completion is expected after Warner Bros. Discovery separates its Discovery Global cable business into a standalone public company, planned for the third quarter of 2026, and regulatory clearance is still required.

Why did Netflix close its game studios?

Because game development proved a poor fit for its business rather than because games did. Netflix shut Team Blue in 2024 and abandoned the in-house AAA title it was making, closed Boss Fight Entertainment in October 2025 with around 130 jobs affected, and moved to close Night School Studio and Moonloot Games. Development involves long timelines and unpredictable hit rates, unlike commissioning a series.

What is Netflix's games strategy now?

Cloud games delivered to the television. Co-CEO Greg Peters has called cloud-based TV games a major priority for 2026, and the catalogue passed 120 mobile and cloud titles by April 2026, offered without advertising or microtransactions. The focus has narrowed to party games, narrative games, children's titles and mainstream-appeal franchises rather than original AAA development.

Why do streaming services want games at all?

Retention. A series is watched and finished, but a game is played repeatedly, which gives subscribers a recurring reason to open the app. Netflix framed the Warner Bros. acquisition in exactly these terms, saying it expected to attract and retain more subscribers and drive more engagement. Games are an engagement product first and a revenue product second.

Sources

StreamingGaming#streaming#gaming#Netflix#cloud gaming#media mergers
Share: